Politics

Biden to Form Commission to Study Packing the Supreme Court

BidenPresident Joe Biden is set to issue an executive order on Friday forming a bipartisan commission that will perform a 180-day study of potential changes to the Supreme Court, including court packing and setting term limits for justices.

“The Commission’s purpose is to provide an analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals,” the White House said in a statement. “The topics it will examine include the genesis of the reform debate; the Court’s role in the Constitutional system; the length of service and turnover of justices on the Court; the membership and size of the Court; and the Court’s case selection, rules, and practices.”

Biden promised to form the bipartisan commission during the campaign in October as he repeatedly dodged questions regarding his stance on expanding the Supreme Court. At that time, progressives had thrust court-packing to the forefront of political debate with calls to add more justices to the nine-judge court after Republicans moved forward with Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearings just weeks before the November 3 election, creating a 6-3 conservative majority on the court.

When asked before the election if voters “deserve to know” his position on court-packing, Biden said, “No they don’t deserve- I’m not gonna play his game. He’d love… that to be the discussion instead of what he’s doing now,” referring to President Trump.

He said that he would clarify his stance on court-packing ahead of the election, contingent upon how Republicans “handle” Barrett’s confirmation process, though he never did.

In an interview with 60 Minutes in October, Biden instead suggested he would “put together a national commission of .. scholars, constitutional scholars, Democrats, Republicans, liberal conservative.”

“And I will ask them to, over 180 days, come back to me with recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it’s getting out of whack, the way in which it’s being handled and it’s not about court-packing,” he said then.

The 36-member panel will be led by Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel for former President Barack Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a Yale Law School professor who served as deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel under the Obama administration.

However, as the commission is not set to issue specific guidance at the conclusion of its study, it remains to be seen if the panel will ultimately clarify Biden’s stance on the issue.

The order comes after Justice Stephen Breyer cautioned earlier this week that court packing for political gain could undermine public trust in the court and its decisions.

“I hope and expect that the court will retain its authority,” Breyer said. “But that authority, like the rule of law, depends on trust, a trust that the court is guided by legal principle, not politics. Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed that perception, further eroding that trust.”

The liberal justice, who at 82 years old is the oldest judge on the court, has faced calls from progressive groups to retire while Democrats control the Senate and the confirmation process.

Reprinted with Permission from - National Review by - Brittany Bernstein

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

As we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we're asking you to consider a gift to help fund our journalism and advocacy.

The need for fact-based reporting that offers real solutions and stops the spread of misinformation has never been greater. Now more than ever, journalism and our first amendment rights are under fire. That's why AMAC is passionately working to increase the number of real news articles we deliver WEEKLY, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill.

AMAC Action, a 501 (C)(4), advocates to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, the rule of law, and love of family.

Thank you for putting your faith in AMAC!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by Outside Contributor
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LeRoy
5 months ago

I understand the 36-member panel will have only 7 conservatives. What a FARCE!

Phil
5 months ago

Joe Biden isn’t “calling” for anything. His senile dementia apparently has progressed far enough so he is incapable of a coherent thought process. He reads what he’s told to read, signs what he’s told to sign, and calls on for questions who he’s told to call on and in what order, so his pre-written answers match the question. His wife needs to be arrested and charged with elder abuse, as does anyone who was involved with getting this puppet elected. Hopefully, the adults will begin taking charge again in 2022. T Jefferson was a proponent of “nullification.” Any “law” that violated the Constitution was not a law at all….I’m sure he’d extend that to executive orders and regulations were he here today. Citizens are NOT required to obey unconstitutional laws, orders, or regulations. Pretty sure he’d be completely disgusted to see how the “federal” government has evolved into a near Marxist dictatorship.

Last edited 5 months ago by Phil
Clark Kent
5 months ago
Reply to  Phil

Due to massive voter fraud that won’t ever be corrected, along with millions of new illegal alien voters, you can kiss off any hope of the GOP capturing the House or Senate in 2022. But thanks for playing.

PaulE
5 months ago
Reply to  Clark Kent

You left out the eventual enactment of H.R.1 into law, which will codify virtually every avenue the Democrats used to secure the White House and the two Georgia Senate seats.

Also once the Democrats pack the Supreme Court with like-minded ultra-liberal Judges, all the state lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of H.R.1 will all end up being either dismissed or just plain out ignored by the new, rubber stamp Supreme Court.

JudyG46
5 months ago

The leftist, socialist, whiny, short-sighted, etc., democrats are just not happy with the majority they have in all three branches of our government. Their agenda to pack the courts and limit judicial terms just proves they are truly out to destroy our government, freedom and do away with our Constitution. They are a combination of the Mafia and the Gestapo.

Last edited 5 months ago by JudyG46
Theresa Coughlin
5 months ago

Let’s be honest about the REAL reason why the democrats want to pack the court. They want the court to be full of liberal activist judges to rubber stamp whatever parts of their agenda they can’t get passed through the legislature ( the branch of government that actually MAKES the laws). Whatever parts of their agenda the legislature they can’t get passed, they want the judiciary to do it for them and that’s NOT how government is supposed to work. Democrats obviously don’t get that and don’t want to,

Kathy Larzelere
5 months ago

The structure of our government was put together so that no single party or people could “take it over for their own purposes. ” Each branch was to be a “checks and balance system” to prevent illegal activity. With the Senate make-up as it is now we are already treading a fine line. The Supreme Court has been working well as it is currently structured and should not be changed just so Socialism can take over.

BRUCE JACKSON
5 months ago

The Constitution, as written, is the law of the land. PERIOD. Anything that is extra-, anti-, aConstitutional or otherwise, having been done outside the Constitution and thereby masquerading as law, is not the law of the land.

Clark Kent
5 months ago
Reply to  BRUCE JACKSON

Hate to burst your bubble, but the Constitution does not set the number of Supreme Court justices.

Phil
5 months ago
Reply to  Clark Kent

No, BUT as Thomas Jefferson wrote, any law that violates the Constitution is not a law at all. It’s called nullification. Laws, orders, regulations that violate the Constitution, need not be obeyed.

Pete M
5 months ago
Reply to  Phil

But as Clark points out, the Constitution is silent on how many jurists may sit on the high court. Therefore any law expanding the number of justices wouldn’t be in violation of the Constitution. That’s insane, I know, but the founding father’s couldn’t possibly have conceived of how evil today’s Democrats would become!!

PaulE
5 months ago
Reply to  Pete M

Democrats are NOT insane. That implies that they do NOT know what they are doing or that they lack any plan associated with their actions. Neither one of those two is true. The Democrat party has simply been completely taken over by Socialists and Marxists, after decades of careful infiltration and planning, who are systematically imposing their values on a largely docile American public.

Marxism did not exist at the time the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution. However, they did warn the public that they had a republic, if they they could keep it. The is a big IF. That meant the people standing up and defending their rights and freedoms, ultimately by any means necessary, against anyone, either foreign or domestic, that threatened the integrity of the republic and their rights and freedoms. A large part of the American public has chosen to now do nothing, so it should come as no surprise that our republic is slipping away.

PaulE
5 months ago

This action by Biden will NOT make the left happy. His handlers are trying to thread the political needle to absolve Biden of any personal responsibility (fallout) of the Democrat Congress eventually packing the Court by appointing a commission comprised of members who all will recommend that conclusion, while at the same time trying to continue to intimidate Chief Justice Roberts to continue supporting the left side of the Court. Example of the latter is his most recent vote concerning religious liberty in California, where he sided with the left. Fortunately, the actual constitutional conservatives on the Court held firm and freedom won 5 to 4.

The left doesn’t want to wait for any commission recommendations. From those Democrat voters that I have spoken to, that are the most openly socialist or communist leaning, they view any delay in court packing as the Democrat party trying to back-track on their promise to them in exchange for their voting for Biden. They want action now to render the Supreme Court a rubber stamp of the Democrat majority controlling both Congress and the White House. So whatever the Democrats ram through on a pure majority vote will be deemed “constitutional” by the Court.

The left are NOT looking for justice. They are simply looking to crush any possible dissent to their agenda by ensuring they have clear majorities across all three branches of government at the highest levels. So expect to hear the mainstream media news outlets put on a lot of speakers, who advocate for much more aggressive action from the White House to bring about a packed court sooner. The progressive groups already targeting Justice Breyer are just the beginning of what will be a coordinated campaign to step up the whole court packing process.

Last edited 5 months ago by PaulE
Clark Kent
5 months ago
Reply to  PaulE

But, but, but the commission will be NON-PARTISAN, don’t ‘cha know? And full of ‘experts’. And it was really Trump that packed the court with conservative justices! Not to mention the Constitution is a ‘living document’ that has to keep up with the times. Fall into line, comrade!

PaulE
5 months ago
Reply to  Clark Kent

Lol! Yeah former members of the Obama administration, members of left wing think tanks and various DNC operatives will certainly be bi-partisan in any remmendation they put forth. Willing to “settle” for either increasing the Court size to either 13 or 15 Justices. Just to be fair. They might even supply a list of new, prospective Justices to help speed the process along. Anything for bi-partisanship.
As for the Constitution as a living document, I am sure once this new, expanded court gets done with things, the Constitution will be dead and buried.

Phil
5 months ago
Reply to  PaulE

I’m sure they’ll have some RINOs like Romney tossed in for appearances sake…they’ll say “The Republican Party agrees with us!”

PaulE
5 months ago
Reply to  Phil

I fully expect RINOs like Romney, Collins and a few others will simply switch parties like Arlen Specter did. After all, that is what they all essentially are. They are only so-called Republicans, because many voters in their respective states will only vote for a politician with an (R) after their name. So these RINOs have to pretend every 6 years to be “conservative” or at least right leaning to be re-elected. Once H.R.1 is enacted into law, what the voters want becomes meaningless. Republicans in Congress will magically lose by a close margin to Democrats by repeating the 2020 playbook over and over again. Which is why folks like Romney will pull an Arlen Specter to have a shot at staying in office.

Duane
5 months ago

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that \”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.\” Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Contact your Congressional Representatives! Perhaps they should STOP fooling around with the make up of the court and START ADMINISTERING JUSTICE AND PUNISHMENT FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR!

Clark Kent
5 months ago
Reply to  Duane

Total waste of my time to communicate with my Federal representatives. Instead of spinning wheels I am actively preparing for the second American Revolution, coming soon to a neighborhood near you.

19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x