National Security / Opinion / Politics

Equality Law Would Punish You for Believing in God; It Would Deny Your First Amendment Protection

equalityWASHINGTON, DC, Apr 2 — The House of Representatives passed the so-called Equality Act in February, and it is now up for consideration in the Senate.  The legislation purports to ensure that people cannot be discriminated against based on their sexual orientation and gender identity.  But, as opponents point out, it would allow discrimination based on religious orientation.

Brad Polumbo put it this way: “From my vantage point as a gay conservative, I can see that the Equality Act goes too far for any level-headed gay rights advocate to support, and its blatant disregard for the basic right to religious freedom is appalling.  The bill purports to protect LGBT Americans like me by prohibiting discrimination ‘based on sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in areas including public accommodations and facilities, education, federal funding, employment, housing, credit, and the jury system.'”

Polumbo is not the only one who fears the rarely reported consequences of the Equality Act and the impact it could have on the First Amendment right to practice one’s religion.  Such questions come to mind: Would priests and ministers be forced to perform same-sex marriages?  Would right-to-life doctors and nurses be prosecuted for refusing to perform abortions?

Bob Carlstrom, president of AMAC Action, the senior advocacy arm of the Association of Mature American Citizens, says that “the right of Americans to practice their faith is a God-given right, sacredly protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; it is hubris, at best, that prompts those who would undermine that right.”

Carlstrom notes that the Equality Act would challenge the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.  He says it would put faith-based institutions in jeopardy should they not adhere to the proposed laws telling them what they can and cannot do as a religious institution.

Pastor John Smith of the Evergreen Baptist Church in Cashmere, WA, described how potentially devastating it could be should the Equality Act become law in an Opinion article recently.  “any pastor who opens up their Bible and reads Romans 1:26-27 and calls homosexuality sinful, or Genesis 1:27 where only two genders are identified, would be charged for inciting hatred to the LGBTQ+ community and will be punished to the fullest extent of the law. And if you Christian, slip up and don’t use an individual’s preferred pronouns, you could lose your job or worse.”

President Tim Schultz of 1st Amendment Partnership warns that the Equality Act would have a burdensome impact on religious schools and faith-based associations, opening them up to lawsuits from gay and transgender groups.

“There would be an effort to punitively sue them into oblivion,” he says.  Schultz also cautions the Equality Act “seeks to weaken the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a federal law aimed at ensuring that the government won’t substantially burden someone’s religious exercise unless it has a compelling interest to do so and can’t find a less restrictive way to protect that interest. If the Equality Act passes, religiously affiliated schools, businesses, nonprofits, and others would have a harder time defending themselves in court.”

However, the efforts to pass the Equality Act may not be strong enough to succeed should unlikely opponents to the legislation such as Democrat, feminist, and LGBTQ activist Kara Dansky come forth.  She told CBS News, “If the bill is permitted to go through it would redefine the word sex to mean gender identity and that has grave consequences for women and girls.  We’re gravely concerned about spaces – locker rooms, changing rooms, dormitories; we’re concerned about the material consequences of eradicating the category ‘female’ from the law.”

CBS also interviewed Brad Polumbo, who concluded that “a lot of more level-headed gay rights activists like myself recognize that a bill that erases the rights of religious liberty of conservative and religious Americans is not what tolerance and equality actually looks like.  I think you can have a law; you can have an approach that bolsters anti-discrimination laws but doesn’t trample over the rights of religious Americans.”

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

As we prepare for what promises to be a pivotal year for America, we're asking you to consider a gift to help fund our journalism and advocacy.

The need for fact-based reporting that offers real solutions and stops the spread of misinformation has never been greater. Now more than ever, journalism and our first amendment rights are under fire. That's why AMAC is passionately working to increase the number of real news articles we deliver WEEKLY, while continuing to strengthen our presence on Capitol Hill.

AMAC Action, a 501 (C)(4), advocates to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, the rule of law, and love of family.

Thank you for putting your faith in AMAC!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by AMAC, John Grimaldi
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leland
5 months ago

Japan made s Hugh mistake when attacking America
Washington DC. Is making the same mistake
If they think they will control the American Spirit they are seriously wrong
Wake up the sleeping giant and Washington DC will soon learn

Janice Forbes
5 months ago

God help us is all I can say. Our government has grown too big for its britches. We need to take our country and our rights back.

John frank
5 months ago

“No people will tamely surrender their liberties ,nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and virtue is preserved. ” Samuel Adams

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x