Advocacy / AMAC Action On Capitol Hill / Politics

Hospital Readmissions Program Accuracy and Accountability Act – S. 2501

AMAC is pleased to support a bipartisan, budget-neutral piece of legislation that aims to mitigate one of the consequences of ObamaCare.  S. 2501, the “Hospital Readmissions Program Accuracy and Accountability Act,” was introduced last week by Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Mark Kirk (R-IL), and Roger Wicker (R-MS) and seeks to ensure that hospitals treating a higher proportion of low-income Medicare patients are not unfairly penalized by the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP).  Created by ObamaCare, the HRRP bases reimbursements to hospitals on the number of avoidable readmissions for Medicare patients.  However, hospitals that serve higher numbers of low-income patients are being overly penalized – even if their quality of care is high – because these types of patients are more likely to be readmitted to hospitals for reasons beyond hospitals’ control.  Thus, S. 2501 would require that the HRRP account for patients’ socio-economic status and other clinical factors when calculating reimbursements.  While AMAC believes that this bill will enable hospitals to evaluated more accurately and fairly, AMAC recognizes the HRRP to be another flawed provision in ObamaCare that allows the Federal government to determine the quality of care provided by doctors and hospitals.  AMAC remains in firm opposition to ObamaCare, but on behalf of mature Americans and seniors, AMAC is committed to supporting legislation like S. 2501 that will address the most difficult parts of the law.

Click Here to Print Letter

The Honorable Joe Manchin
U.S. Senate
306 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Manchin,

On behalf of the 1.2 million members of AMAC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, I am writing to offer support to S. 2501, the “Hospital Readmissions Program Accuracy and Accountability Act.” This bipartisan, budget-neutral bill seeks to ensure that hospitals servicing a higher proportion of low-income Medicare patients are not unfairly penalized by the Hospital Readmissions Reductions Program (HRRP) – a flawed program established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known more commonly as “ObamaCare.”

Under ObamaCare, the HRRP bases Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) reimbursements for hospitals on the number of avoidable readmissions for Medicare patients. Yet, in many cases, hospitals that are treating disproportionately high numbers of low-income patients are being overly penalized – even if their quality of care is high – because their patients are more likely to be readmitted due to factors outside of the hospitals’ control. To address this critical concern, S. 2501 aims to ensure that the HRRP actually reflects the quality of care that hospitals provide by evaluating socio-economic status and other clinical factors, such as comorbidities and the severity of patient illness, when calculating reimbursements. AMAC believes that S. 2501 will enable hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries nationwide to be evaluated in a more accurate manner.

Given the diverse health care needs of Americans across the country, AMAC has never felt that the Federal government is the proper authority to determine the quality of care provided by doctors and hospitals. AMAC remains very concerned about the unintended and unrecognized impacts of ObamaCare on Medicare and the delivery of health care to mature Americans. AMAC believes this bill is the type of important and targeted legislation needed to address the most difficult parts of ObamaCare. Thanks to your attention to this significant issue, AMAC is pleased to support S. 2501, the “Hospital Readmissions Program Accuracy and Accountability Act.”

Sincerely,
Dan Weber
President and Founder of AMAC

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Concerned Citizen
7 years ago

The last part of the introduction says: “AMAC remains in firm opposition to ObamaCare, but on behalf of mature Americans and seniors, AMAC is committed to supporting legislation like S. 2501 that will address the most difficult parts of the law.”

Paul, if you were in a lifeboat as the Titanic sunk, would you refuse to throw out a life saver ring to a sinking passenger, because the rescue ship was spotted on the horizon? I would hope not! We need to do what we can do to mitigate as much damage as we can in the meantime. Obamacare is so bad that probably by November elections, all the new enrollees will find out just how crappy the new plans are. People have been assured they can keep their doctors, but are now finding that they don’t have the hospital plan where their doctors practice! They’re also finding out how high the deductibles really are, or how far away their new hospitals are. We’ve got to keep trying – one of these days Harry is going to have to budge! You are right that the few Dems jumping off the ACA ship are doing so to maintain their seats, but I think most people can see through that. And once the union plans are subjected to ACA, there is going to be a real ruckus!

I would like to see the people of Nevada do a recall election and recall Reid. It may be a first, but it’s worth a try! At any rate, if conservatives can get the majority in Nov., they had better be ready! They can always resurrect this bill then and force Obama to go on records as vetoing it.

PaulE
7 years ago

Rather than support the repeal of Obamacare, which created this inane penalty in the first place, along with several others, we have a group of Democrats in the Senate joining in with some Republicans on legislation to paper over the problem. Gee, could the fact that these Democrats are at risk of losing their seats this November have anything to do with this? Good luck getting Harry Reid to agree to bring this bill up for a full floor vote.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x