Inflation to Hit 1 Million Percent in Collapsing, Socialist Venezuela

Venezuela socialism socialist collapsing inflationVenezuela’s inflation may hit 1 million percent by the end of the year, the International Monetary Fund announced last Monday.

This incredible hyperinflation is reminiscent of Weimar Germany during the years immediately after World War I, in which wheelbarrows full of cash were required to buy bare essential items, like a loaf of bread.

To counter the hyperinflation problem, Venezuela’s answer is to lop off five zeros from its currency value and launch a state-backed cryptocurrency.

It wasn’t that long ago that the left praised socialist Venezuela as a model country, a good comparison to the mean, ruthless system of the United States.

“Since the [Hugo] Chávez government got control over the national oil industry, poverty has been cut by half, and extreme poverty by 70 percent,” wrote New York Times contributor Mark Weisbrot in the wake of socialist President Hugo Chavez’s re-election in 2012. “College enrollment has more than doubled, millions of people have access to health care for the first time and the number of people eligible for public pensions has quadrupled.”

Just six years later and the country is a catastrophe. It seems 21st-century socialism hasn’t worked any better than 20th-century socialism, or any other kind of socialism for that matter.

Venezuela’s dire state is not for lack of resources. It is the most oil-rich country in the world and used to be one of the wealthiest nations in South America. Now, it’s teetering on the edge of economic oblivion.

The scale of Venezuela’s collapse is staggering. The economy has halved since 2013 and unemployment has now reached 30 percent. Basic items like baby formula and toilet paper can’t be found on store shelves.

People have turned to “car cannibalism” (or mass carpooling) to minimize the number of vehicles running. Public transportation has ground to a halt.

Hunger strikes by workers in the country’s nationalized electricity company have led to widespread power outages and water shortages.

Venezuela now struggles to pump oil out of the ground as its nationalized oil company is, according to CNN, “forced to import light crude from the United States to dilute the heavy oil it drills in Venezuela.”

Ironically, the policy of nationalization—purportedly to give back to the people—has left those very people destitute.

No country has fallen farther and faster on The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom than Venezuela.

“In 1995, the first year of the index, Venezuela scored 59.8 on its 0-to-100 scale, more than two points above the world average,” wrote Heritage Foundation Research Coordinator Patrick Tyrrell. “That prosperity did not last. Under [Presidents Hugo] Chavez and [Nicolas] Maduro, economic freedom has evaporated, and Venezuela is now one of the most economically repressed countries in the world, second only to North Korea.”

With the loss of economic freedom has come the loss of political freedom. Elections have become a sham as the once democratic country has turned into strongman dictatorship under Maduro, where opposition to the regime is quickly and ruthlessly crushed.

Criminality and corruption are rampant. The country is now ruled by a cartel of connected drug kingpins and other thugs who use government power to enrich themselves and their families.

Hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans have fled the country in a humanitarian crisis that mirrors that of Syria—except this one was not forced by a civil war.

Venezuela is now a country where “millionaires are poor,” as a Venezuelan nurse said recently in an interview with The Guardian.

What’s remarkable is that while this tragedy plays out, the American left continues to flirt with socialism and strains to explain why it would be a good thing for the American people. Millennials in particular have been susceptible to embracing it, at least in theory.

Socialism is a philosophy that, at best, has proven to be ideologically bankrupt, having failed to produce anything close to a free-market system. At worst, it is a weapon for petty thug-tyrants to prop themselves up while strangling the nation’s economy and stomping on the rights of citizens with impunity, as has been the case in Venezuela.

It’s increasingly popular on the left to rebrand socialism as “democratic socialism,” perhaps to distinguish their own ideology from the statist and obviously destructive form of socialism practiced in Venezuela. They see their own socialism as a happier, gentler version of the creed.

But this distinction is evasive.

Venezuela’s socialism at least started out as “democratic” before it failed and ultimately led to tyranny. That’s an easy flip to make without constitutional norms, institutional protections, and a cultural creed of limited government.

American leftists often point to Nordic countries as examples of socialism that “works.” The problem is that while some of those countries provide generous social safety programs, they are not quite socialist.

All of them rank highly on The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom. Denmark and Sweden even rate above the United States. In 2015, Denmark’s president insisted that his country was not socialist, but had a “market economy.”

Most of the Nordic countries had thriving economies before they grew their welfare programs, and some have even trimmed those programs in recent years. Finland, for example, which experimented with a universal basic income program, ended it after just two years.

Nordic countries mostly avoided the kinds of government overregulation and intervention that annihilated the economies of Venezuela and other countries in the past century.

So, mission accomplished?

Not quite. Even in these alleged Scandinavian utopias, broad social safety nets and high taxes have produced a country with much lower standards of living than the United States as a whole.

For instance, Americans of Danish descent have a drastically higher income than Danes living in Denmark, as well as lower rates of poverty.

“A common misconception is that the Nordic countries became socially and economically successful by introducing universal welfare states funded by high taxes,” wrote Nima Sanandaji, the author of “Debunking Utopia: Exposing the Myth of Nordic Socialism.” “In fact, their economic and social success had already materialized during a period when these countries combined a small public sector with free-market policies. The welfare state was introduced afterward. That the Nordic countries are so successful is due to an exceptional culture that emphasizes social cohesion, hard work, and individual responsibility.”

Socialist policies erode these cultural norms, undermine individual responsibility and the rule of law, and create a destructive race to the bottom to prove that one is most in need.

Regardless of the distinctions, real or imagined, socialism has proved to be a failure wherever it is tried. Its proponents claim to want to lift up the poor, but all it does is drag down everyone, creating economic misery for rich and poor alike.

The “end of history”–as Marxists call it–for Venezuela, is collapse. A fate that may soon befall its socialist neighbors, like Nicaragua.

It’s a good lesson for Americans, especially those with the delusion that we can make it work here.

Reprinted with permission from - The Daily Signal - by Jarrett Stepman

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Koser
3 years ago

Norway is subsidized by the North Sea oil profits, which will eventually run out, and by their abundant hydro-electric power, which they are wisely developing very rapidly. They were also wise not to allow themselves to be overrun by “refuges” from the middle east.

3 years ago

There is a difference between Germany of the Weimar Republic and today’s Venezuela. Back under the Weimar Republic, there were still food and goods on the shelves that could be purchased, if you had a big enough wheelbarrow of cash. In today’s Venezuela, even if you have a massive wheelbarrow of worthless Venezuelan currency, the store shelves are all bare. No matter where you go in Venezuela. Only the small number of power elite loyal to the socialist dictator Nicolas Maduro get a weekly delivery of food and some luxury goods from Maduro’s private, well guarded warehouses. The rest of the population is left to forage in garbage dumps, eat grass, tree bark or starve to death. The latter being a popular means of keeping the number of hungry mouths to feed way down. See Stalin and Mao’s mass starvation of their people as a reference. Doctors and hospitals in Venezuela ran out of everything long ago. So getting moderately or seriously ill is a death sentence in Venezuela.

In short, socialism is once again working exactly as it has always worked. Everyone, but the few ruling at the very top, have been reduced to abject poverty, starvation and lack of basic healthcare. The families of Chavez and Maduro became some of the richest families in South America due to their pillaging the nation’s wealth for their own enrichment. All this is what is known as “economic and social justice”. Everyone is equally poor, starving and miserable. Everyone has been reduced to a future devoid of hope as long as socialism is firmly in place. The ability of the people to vote out the socialist regime is long gone. Been that way since shortly after Chavez convinced the people to elect him on his platform of “equality for all”. They certainly all are equal today all right. Just not in the way they envisioned, because they were too ignorant to understand what socialism would deliver. In all past countries adopting socialism, when socialists gain power, the first thing they do is disband or execute any political opposition in both the legislative or judicial branches of government. Thus clearing the field for an unopposed, one party dictatorial rule. That is exactly what Chavez once in power. Maduro has simply continued to implement the socialist policies of Chavez to their expected conclusion.

As for it being a good lesson for Americans, I hate to say this but most Americans can’t even find Venezuela on a world map. Especially the young, who if it doesn’t involve them, they have scant interest in it. Even fewer are aware of how Venezuela got into this whole mess or how truly terrible the conditions on the ground there are. The MSM won’t cover the situation, other than maybe a brief mention about some problems occurring in the country. If they were to devote serious air or print time, the average American might begin to realize that this is what socialism and its policies leads to. The same socialism and policies that so many politicians in this country are actively promoting as the cure all for the “sins of the United States”. Obviously we can’t have that happen. So the MSM will continue to avoid any news coverage related to Venezuela, Ecuador or any other country currently experiencing the “benefits” of socialism.

If you want to educate people about this and other issues, then it is up to YOU. That’s right, you have to try to educate others, because that is the only way we are going to reach the number of people necessary to ensure people understand what the Democrats are selling. That it is exactly the same socialism that Venezuela is enjoying today. That is if you really care about the country’s future or are you merely content to wring your hands and hope someone else does something. The choice is yours. President Trump can’t possibly fix everything himself and should the Democrats re-take either house of Congress this fall, then the Trump agenda, OUR AGENDA, dies and President Trump become a lame duck President. So the choice is yours. Something to think about.

Have a nice weekend.

2 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

Thank you for sharing the above! I am always trying to ‘do my homework, educate myself first, and then educate others’; and I firmly believe that we must join the battle with Trump and those in Congress that fight for our American Constitutional Republic. We cannot afford to ignore or ‘opt out’ of the battle. Our children’s lives depend on this.

3 years ago

How about every Freshman College Student being required to attend their first semester class in Socialism 101 studying Venezuela’s economy since Chavez took over. Maybe it should be required reading for all members of the U.S. Congress also. Common Sense just isn’t Common among the Progressively Challenged Liberals!

2 years ago
Reply to  Rik

A required test on our Constitution, Amendments and Bill of Rights, should be mandatory for anyone running for office. We would not have the problems we have now.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x