Russian Collusion? Yep, But It Was Clinton/Obama, Not Trump

-from TheNewAmerican

With all of the focus on the alleged (yet never demonstrated, much less proved) connections between President Trump and Russia over the past year, the liberal mainstream media have bent over backwards to keep the attention off of the demonstrable (and likely soon to be proved) connections between Hillary Clinton and Russia. New reports may make it impossible to continue that ruse.russian-collusion-hillary

Hillary Clinton got quite a bit of political play out of calling Trump “Putin’s puppet” during debates and throughout the election cycle. In the end, though, her attacks missed their mark and she missed the necessary votes to secure the White House and the advent of a Clinton 2.0 presidency — an administration that would certainly have continued (and escalated) the corruption of the Clinton 1.0 presidency.

Newly released information confirms that it is Hillary Clinton — as secretary of state — and not Trump who can be shown to be “Putin’s puppet. The Hill, Fox News, Newsweek, and others are reporting that a deal between Clinton’s State Department and Russian interests that transferred 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russian control involved bribery, collusion, and coverup. And Clinton’s fingerprints are all over it.

This confirms reports published by The New American even as the failed Clinton campaign and its accomplices in the liberal mainstream media continued to beat the stillborn horse of Trump/Russia collusion. In an article originally published in our print magazine and later published online, this writer addressed the evidence of “unethical, illegal, and corrupt behavior” revealed in the leaked Clinton campaign and DNC e-mails and documents published by WikiLeaks:

“Those e-mails and documents serve as a box full of smoking guns against the DNC and Clinton campaign. A quick look at just a few of those smoking guns — any of which alone would be damning — illustrates why Clinton (with the help of the liberal media) wanted to keep the attention on the supposed source of the leak, rather than on what the e-mails show about Clinton and her comrades in the DNC….

As secretary of state, Clinton “reset” relations with Putin’s Russia, which helped the Clinton Foundation and its donors make millions of dollars off a deal that sold the mining company Uranium One (and 25 percent of our strategic uranium production) to Russia.”

That report by The New American — in February — was published months before The Hill “broke” this story.

Now, more is known about that deal. And the more that comes out, the worse it looks for both Clinton and Obama: FBI and court documents show that the Obama-era FBI (under the “leadership” of ousted FBI Director James Comey) was aware that Putin’s regime in Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, according to a report by The Hill. As an aside, does anyone still think it was a mistake for Trump to fire Comey?

The evidence of bribes and kickbacks is not mere conjecture and innuendo (as in the case of allegations against Trump), but is solidly supported by “a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry” who gathered “extensive financial records,” made “secret recordings,” and intercepted “emails as early as 2009,” according to The Hill. Moreover:

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.

And yet — even with the FBI and other federal authorities being aware of this in 2009, the DOJ dragged the investigation out until 2015, allowing a deal to go through that transferred between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia in the Uranium One deal that fattened the coffers of the Clinton Foundation, strengthened Putin’s Russia, and weakened the United States. For the anti-American element (for whom Clinton was the perfect candidate), that is a win/win/win scenario.

As Newsweek put it, “The Obama administration signed a controversial nuclear deal with Moscow despite prior FBI findings that Russian officials were bribing their way into the U.S. atomic energy industry, according to government documents just published by The Hill.”

So, while Hillary Clinton was using Russia as a bogeyman during the campaign by claiming that if Trump were elected, Putin would gain control of the United States, the reality is that she had — as secretary of state — already laid that groundwork. As president, she would likely have continued to build upon it, doing exactly what she accused Trump of planning to do.

As a result of this information coming to light, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is calling for his committee to conduct a real investigation into the Uranium One deal, the Obama administration, and Hillary Clinton. As Fox News is reporting:

“Grassley on Wednesday released a series of letters he fired off last week to 10 federal agencies, addressing those issues in detail and raising the question of whether the committee that approved the transaction was aware of the FBI probe. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) included then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

At the beginning of a hearing with Attorney General Jeff Sessions today, Grassley said, “This committee has an obligation to get to the bottom of this issue.” So true. And the bottom of this issue could be a long way down for Clinton and Obama.

As for those Democrats who have been raising the roof calling for an end to “Russian collusion,” none appears to have come forward to celebrate this break in the case. It appears they are only interested in ending alleged collusion when it involves their opponent, but not actual collusion when it involves at least two of their darlings.


The New American - by C. Mitchell Shaw

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dean Shiner
5 years ago

So, I would like to know WHAT took so Long ? I could see this SCAM and the smoke Screen attack on Trump from my house and I am not exactly a “Rocket scientist”

5 years ago

The swamp has grown so vast and wide draining it will take more then 2 terms it seems. But it takes workers, one person can’t do it alone.

Rodney Terrell
5 years ago

It’s hatred and anger that acts as a glue to solidify the fake news media, in it’s efforts to prevent president Trump from moving forward with his agenda.
President Trump has continually called them out and they only seem to know one way to respond.
Some of the establishment are already showing signs that politician or not, they better get on board.
As for the fake news, they nrver will.

5 years ago
Reply to  Rodney Terrell


5 years ago

Not at all surprising!

Deef Smith
5 years ago

Held my nose and watched some of the MSM news reports and all they can report on is this latest attempt to attack the White House in Africa. They do not report the news . They are a propaganda machine for the Democrat party. This Clinton Russian collusion is a much bigger story and not a peep from the MSM!

5 years ago

Sounds like you done-did break the code.

5 years ago

Mueller, Comey, and Holder were also privy to this Obama/Clinton corruption with Russia all along, and now Mueller is heading the Trump / Russia “investigation”. I believe it was only to keep the focus off the actual crimes that were committed in the Obama administration, while trying to bring down our duly elected POTUS. The Clinton’s received in the hundreds of millions from this deal with Russia, funneled through the Clinton Crime Family Foundation of course.

O. Ryan Faust
5 years ago

I’ll trust the government again when hiLIARy begins serving her multiple-lifetime prison sentence; not before.

5 years ago

We knew this all along. So when are the indictments coming down??? The Congress can’t do squat. They did nothing against LERNER or HOLDER. So what power do they have…..Get rid of Mueller and Rod Rosenstein.

5 years ago

In my opinion, if Trump would get his ego out of the way, eliminate all press conferences and stay off Twitter so as not give the libs any ammunition he could make a whole lot more headway. Sad as it is, he does have not the golden tongue like the previous president nor are his sarcastic barbs and comments helping anyone, especially him.

5 years ago

All of the comments here have been correct. The question is WHY? WHY can’t we arrest hilarious and obama? And all who aided them. If all they did was done by an American citizen….what would have happened? ELECTRIC CHAIR. How pitiful that these monsters are allowed to get away with their treasonous acts. ELECTROCUTE THEM as they are guilty of MURDER and TREASON.

5 years ago

This corrupt, lying left-wing lunatic belongs in jail along with her womanizing liar of a “husband” and equally corrupt daughter.

5 years ago

Congress has no power to investigate anything. This has to go to a federal judge.

5 years ago

Wasn’t her and hubby responsible for uranium deal to russia maybe that shiuld be reneegoiated

Deef Smith
5 years ago

This is just the tip of the iceberg on the corruption that occurred during the horrible Obama years. The MSM has the job of uncovering this corruption. Instead they worshiped the POS . Just now they are going after this Clinton Crime family . Why is Sessions dragging his feet? Is he involved in this?? Hillary knew of Comey’s involvement and probably blackmailed him to get off on her E-mails.
Obama years will be seen as the most corrupt administration in history.

5 years ago

This is why our Constitution and right to free speech is being attacked The people of the resistance do not want to hear the truth, so they violate our free speech rights when we try to tell them what the truth actually is. It’s easier to call us all racists than to actually admit they are only helping the corruption. It’s easier to take a knee, virtually or figuratively, than it is to be responsible in their protests and use their popularity, voice, and money to actually CHANGE the thing they are crying about.

5 years ago
Reply to  Cheryl

Not off topic. The wall of resistance starts with the corruption in the WH.

Timothy R. Buttner
5 years ago

This whole issue is an extreme example of the Projection Theory: if one wishes to know what the Demmycrats are up to, take a look at what they are accusing their opponents of doing…(Other extreme examples include both anti-women activities and the race card.)

5 years ago

LOCK HER UP1 LOCK HER UP1 Take Pres. Obama and all his cronies with her. It’s about time the Republicans got some backbone and
fought fire with fire. I hope that there will be people in authority that will take this whole corrupt matter to the highest level of investigation
and find them all guilty.

5 years ago
Reply to  Joan

None of this is going to happen before we get control of voter ID. That is the only way we can keep the communistic demoncrats out of office, all of them, and I mean all of the demoncrats have communistic leanings, and as long as they hold an office in our government, we will get resistance to any laws the Republicans try to pass. That is why Obama is trying to say that voter ID is racist, of course all blacks bring up the race card. Black Lives Matter was not formed until Obama took office, and now they are killing our police officers and getting away with it. It’s stange that for the last eight years (under Obama’s control) that the voting polls were askew with counties going completely Democratic with absolutely not even one Republican vote, and you will never convince me that a whole county didn’t have one single Republican in it. And also there were counties that had more Democratic votes than there were people of voting age even in that county, it appears that the Democrats have found away to raise the dead, especially without voter ID. And also during those same eight years, Obama allowed illegal aliens to stream across our southern border and gave them driver’s license and food stamps and housing just so the Demoncrats can keep on being elected to office, that’s the reason Hillary was completely shocked when she didn’t win the election, her biggest down fall was that alot of states that have voted blue for so many years were fed up with the Democrats and turned red, and those states had alot of electoral votes. And she claimed that she won the popular vote, and that was true, but alot of those votes were from California (which has been Democratic for years) and also there were alot of those illegal votes that I mentioned above.

Lee McQuillen
5 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Now, according to Obama, we won’t tolerate divisiveness. Of course, he was a major player in creating it in the first place but apparently people can’t remember how he divided us into many various groups – by race, sexual orientation, sex, religion, income, occupation, etc. He did that intensively from day 1, more mildly before he was elected.

5 years ago
Reply to  Lee McQuillen

You done-did break the code.

Dawn Bove
5 years ago

Finally the truth is coming out. Disgusting that it’s taken so long. A perfect example of the swamp.

5 years ago

Lets not forget the connection to the Bundy Ranch and Maleur standoffs. The Bundy’s and other ranchers were being squeezed off their own lands to give away these uranium rich lands as part of the Uranium one deal. Not one word of that connection hit the lamestream media. Private property rights need to take priority to corrupt deals with foreign nations no matter who gets a big payout.

Ivan Berry
5 years ago
Reply to  Andie

Great observation, Andie.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x