Finance / Government Watch / Politics

The Inflation Reduction Act Offers Green Welfare to High-Income Households

Inflation Reduction Act

There are numerous critiques of Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, including that it raises taxes on those earning less than $400,000, won’t reduce inflation, and features the sort of budget gimmicks Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) previously decried. But one criticism—that the bill includes what House Ways and Means Republicans dub “green welfare” for high-income households—may prove harder for supporters to rebut. That’s because even the New York Times admits the legislation includes subsidies that only high-income households can afford to claim.

In an August 8 article titled “Electric Cars Too Costly for Many, Even with Aid in Climate Bill,” the Times notes the obvious—that “electric vehicles remain largely the province of the rich.” The reason? New electric vehicle prices are simply beyond the reach of most consumers:

. . . soaring prices of commodities like lithium, an essential ingredient in batteries, helped raise the average sticker price of an electric vehicle 14 percent last year to $66,000, $20,000 more than the average for all new cars, according to Kelley Blue Book.

Those factors, among other “bottlenecks,” will “take years to unclog,” according to the article. In the meantime, as the headline notes, federal tax credits of up to $7,500 in the Inflation Reduction Act will barely make a dent, leaving high-income households as the only ones who can afford most electric vehicles. That also reinforces the tone-deafness behind some Democrats’ recently proposed “solution” for high gas prices—that consumers should just buy an electric vehicle.

It remains to be seen whether consumers will even find qualifying vehicles to buy. Experts suggest “the vast majority” of current electric vehicles won’t qualify for the full new vehicle credit as written. But if qualifying vehicles are purchased, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) confirms such credits have a history of subsidizing higher-income households. Of prior tax credits for electric vehicle (EV) purchases, CRS reports that

In 2016, 57,066 individual taxpayers claimed $375 million in plug-in EV tax credits. EV tax credits are disproportionately claimed by higher-income taxpayers. Most of the tax credits (78%) are claimed by filers with adjusted gross income (AGI) of $100,000 or more, and those filers receive an even higher proportion (83%) of the amount of credits claimed.

The authors of the bill placed caps on the cost of new electric vehicles that can qualify for the subsidies—$55,000 for cars and $80,000 for trucks and SUVs. They also limited the annual income of qualifying purchasers at $150,000 for single and $300,000 for joint filers. That would disqualify the very top income households, while leaving the rest of even the highest income quintile eligible for tax credits. They’ll certainly need a high income to afford a $70,000 electric SUV, even counting the credit. The bill sets lower price and income thresholds for those claiming a $4,000 credit offered for used electric vehicle purchases. But few may be able to take advantage, as the Times notes the supply of used electric cars is “scarce,” and less than 20 percent fall under the $25,000 price cap.

The legislation also reups billions of dollars in subsidies for green home improvements (think solar panels and new appliances), which are also likely to flow disproportionately to upper-income households—and are not subject to income limits. The Wall Street Journal reports that

Some public-finance specialists say that the credits amount to a windfall for taxpayers who would have made energy-efficient home improvements anyway, and the incentive favors middle- and upper-income taxpayers. A 2018 Congressional Research Service paper showed that taxpayers with income of $200,000 and above received on average a credit that is approximately seven times the average credit received by taxpayers with income of $30,000 and below.

None of this is news. A 2015 study summarized that,

Since 2006, U.S. households have received more than $18 billion in federal income tax credits for weatherizing their homes, installing solar panels, buying hybrid and electric vehicles, and other “clean energy” investments. . . . We find that these tax expenditures have gone predominantly to higher-income Americans. The bottom three income quintiles have received about 10% of all credits, while the top quintile has received about 60%. The most extreme is the program aimed at electric vehicles, where we find that the top income quintile has received about 90% of all credits.

All of which shows that sometimes welfare—in this case, green welfare—can be for high-income people, too.


Reprinted with Permission from - American Enterprise Institute by - Matt Weidinger

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!


Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rich
1 month ago

I just love those who think they are “god” and can fix the climate one new law at a time. It takes money to play in the green new deal game. Those of us that can’t afford to play can sit back and watch the “elites” “save our planet”. I guess I’ll go and see if I can order a new electric golf cart. I might be able to afford that. In the mean time I will tune up my bicycle and enjoy the new “normal”.

Janet
1 month ago

Buying electric vehicles only supports communist China. The batteries come from China and they are made in an African nation by child labor. Also the solar panels come from China made with forced labor. Why would we want to support them?

Michael
1 month ago

Even if I could afford to buy an electric car I wouldn’t. I read way too many reports of fires that can’t be put out due to the battery material. Second you’re still using carbon based fuel to make the electricity to charge the batteries. Much more research is to be made before we can make an electric auto.

Gabe Hanzeli
1 month ago

Biden just created a $2000 a year tax on low and middle income people.

remember when the democrats complained about trumps tax cuts? yup democrats increasing taxes again.

Rich
1 month ago
Reply to  Gabe Hanzeli

It’s what they do best. That, and blaming everyone else.

Rik
1 month ago

The Inflation INDUCEMENT Act is just the next step in these Communist Democrats plan to DESTROY AMERICA! . . . Resist and fight against Anything and Everything this Communist Wannabe does or America as we knew it will be lost forever!

GTPatriot
1 month ago

As usual, the public will learn the disgusting details of this bill in the next 3-4 weeks after its passage This is a shut down petroleum, mega tax incomes below $100K, IRS bully bill and Joe Manchin sucked it up completely. He needs to be named Slow-Joe as he is slow to come around.
Don’t know what backdoor promises Joe received for his vote but this bill sure as hell does nothing
for West Virginia.
Inflation Reduction Act ? How about calling it the Screw America Act ? I’m sick of naming these
Federal Robbery Acts with lip-stick – on -a -pig names. Inflation was caused by the $5 trillion China Virus over-reaction act. The under $100K class, which is most of us, will be paying for this for the next 20 years.
We own this problem and we deserve this disaster. Why ? We could have re-elected Trump but didn’t. We did this ourselves. Don’t complain to DC. Complain to your neighbor. DId he vote for Biden ? Or did you ?

Mike Miller
1 month ago

Most of the energy credits involved only apply to taxes owed. After taking child tax credit and education credits most low income taxpayers don’t get to write off any energy credits. Most energy credits die if not used the year of purchase. There are no rollover provisions.

Debra Reynolds
1 month ago
Reply to  Mike Miller

“most”? Most low-income taxpayers are seniors (no children, no education loans). With aging homes. No one will help them.

MariaRose
1 month ago
Reply to  Debra Reynolds

According to the progressive Squad, most of us seniors need to be removed from our benefits since we are living too long.

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x